- India has witnessed a sharp rise in hate crimes against Muslims and Christians, with a 40% increase since 2022, according to official data and civil society reports.
- The RSS, a Hindu nationalist organization, is intensifying diplomatic and cultural lobbying in Western capitals to counter international condemnation of hate crimes.
- Analysts describe the RSS’s efforts as a strategic attempt at damage control to reframe religious violence as a defense of Indian cultural sovereignty.
- The Indian government’s National Crime Records Bureau reported a rise in crimes targeting religious minorities from 618 in 2022 to over 860 in 2023.
- Activists argue that the actual figures are significantly higher due to underreporting and police reluctance to register cases, making it difficult to gauge the true extent of the crisis.
India is witnessing a sharp rise in hate crimes against religious minorities, particularly Muslims and Christians, with official data and civil society reports indicating a 40% increase since 2022. The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a far-right Hindu nationalist organization and ideological backbone of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), is intensifying diplomatic and cultural lobbying in Western capitals to counter growing international condemnation. Analysts describe this as a strategic effort at damage control, aiming to reframe religious violence as a defense of Indian cultural sovereignty against perceived Western moral imperialism.
Rising Incidents and Documented Violence
According to the Indian government’s National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), crimes targeting religious minorities rose from 618 in 2022 to over 860 in 2023, though activists argue the actual figures are significantly higher due to underreporting and police reluctance to register cases. A report by the United Christian Forum documented 646 incidents of violence against Christians in 2023 alone, including church attacks, forced conversions, and mob lynchings. Similarly, the Indian Muslim community has faced increasing threats, including targeted killings in regions like Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh, often linked to accusations of ‘cow smuggling’ or ‘love jihad’—a conspiracy theory alleging Muslim men seduce Hindu women to convert them. International watchdogs such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have repeatedly condemned India’s failure to protect minority rights, with the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) recommending India be designated a ‘Country of Particular Concern’ since 2020.
Key Players: RSS, BJP, and the Hindu Nationalist Network
The RSS, founded in 1925, operates as a paramilitary volunteer organization with an estimated five million members and a vast network of affiliated groups known as the Sangh Parivar, including the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) and Bajrang Dal. While officially non-political, the RSS exercises outsized influence on national policy through its ideological alignment with the BJP, which has governed India since 2014. In recent months, senior RSS leaders have held closed-door meetings with European diplomats and American think tanks, emphasizing Hindu cultural revival and national unity while downplaying allegations of sectarian violence. These outreach efforts are coordinated through affiliated cultural organizations such as the India Foundation and the Vivekananda International Foundation, which host international conferences and publish papers defending India’s secular model as ‘civilizational’ rather than ‘Western liberal.’ Critics argue these efforts obscure the RSS’s role in normalizing hate speech and fostering a climate of impunity for vigilante groups.
Trade-Offs: Sovereignty vs. Human Rights, Image vs. Accountability
The RSS’s campaign to influence Western opinion hinges on a dual narrative: that India’s social cohesion is rooted in Hindu cultural primacy, and that external criticism amounts to neo-colonial interference. This framing resonates with nationalist sentiment at home and appeals to anti-Western skepticism among Global South governments. However, it comes at a cost. India’s democratic credentials, once a point of pride, are increasingly questioned by institutions like Economist Intelligence Unit and Freedom House, which downgraded India to a ‘hybrid regime’ in 2021. While the government benefits from reduced foreign pressure, the long-term erosion of trust among minority communities threatens internal stability. Moreover, diaspora Hindu groups in the U.S. and UK, which fund cultural centers and political advocacy, risk reputational damage if linked to extremist rhetoric, potentially triggering regulatory scrutiny in host countries.
Why the Timing Matters: Global Attention and Domestic Mobilization
The RSS’s intensified outreach coincides with heightened international scrutiny ahead of India’s 2024 general elections and growing diplomatic engagement with Western powers on strategic issues like Indo-Pacific security and supply chain diversification. As India positions itself as a counterweight to China and a leader of the Global South, it seeks to insulate itself from human rights criticism that could undermine its geopolitical stature. Simultaneously, domestic mobilization around Hindu identity has reached new intensity, with state governments in BJP-ruled states enacting ‘anti-conversion’ laws and revising school curricula to emphasize Hindu epics. The timing reflects a calculated effort to preempt Western backlash by reframing religious nationalism as a legitimate expression of post-colonial self-determination, rather than a threat to pluralism.
Where We Go From Here
In the next six to twelve months, India could follow one of three trajectories. First, the government may continue to marginalize minority voices while expanding cultural diplomacy, resulting in sustained low-level violence and incremental erosion of secular institutions. Second, a major communal incident could trigger international sanctions or travel advisories, forcing a recalibration of foreign engagement. Third, internal dissent within the BJP or electoral setbacks in key states might create space for moderate voices to challenge the RSS’s ideological dominance. Each scenario hinges on the balance between domestic political calculations and external diplomatic pressure, with minority communities bearing the brunt of uncertainty.
Bottom line — the RSS’s lobbying campaign reflects a broader strategy to legitimize Hindu majoritarianism internationally while suppressing dissent at home, raising profound questions about India’s future as a pluralistic democracy.
Source: Al Jazeera




